Spitzer faults officials for delaying decisive action on GE, PCBs
By John Caher and James M. Odato
Copyright 1998 The Times Union (Albany, NY)
September 4, 1998
Attorney general hopeful sketches out his own plan for resolution
Albany Attorney general candidate Eliot Spitzer said Thursday that buck-passing
by federal and state officials and "horrendous government lawyering" have
delayed for decades a resolution of the question of whether General Electric is
to blame for PCBs contamination of the Hudson River.
Spitzer, who is seeking the Democratic
nomination, told the Times Union editorial board that he met with GE officials
last week and was assured the firm could complete a technical study within
eight weeks to move the issue to resolution.
At the meeting and in a campaign stop at the Capitol, Spitzer said if he were
attorney general,
he'd give the company four months to conclude its work, then press a lawsuit if
it failed to meet the deadline. He also said he'd require GE to pay New York
back millions of dollars the Stamford, Conn.-based company has received in
state tax breaks and grants.
"I met with GE last Friday," Spitzer said. "I cross-examined the people they
had there. We didn't come to any conclusions, of course, but . . . I got them
to essentially admit it would take eight weeks to do the peer review that they
want done of the EPA study."
EPA has not yet decided if
GE is liable for cleanup, and GE objects to the way the agency performed tests
to determine that issue. However, the company can complete its own analysis
within two months, Spitzer said.
The state has agreed with EPA's science and sent formal comments to the agency
Monday, said Gary Sheffer, a
spokesman for the Department of Environmental Conservation. He said GE arrived
Tuesday at DEC headquarters to present its argument of EPA's faulty work and
DEC is open to amending its comments.
Sheffer added the state does not have standing in the Hudson River sediment
case because that is a federal Superfund site.
Further, he said, Gov. George Pataki has written twice to EPA expressing
frustration at the slow pace of resolving the sediment cleanup and the state is
preparing a lawsuit to make those responsible for the pollution pay for
damaging natural resources.
Spitzer said the state essentially signed off
on the matter and made a decision to allow the federal government to take the
lead. The candidate said New York should retake control and get the Hudson
River cleaned in a reasonable period of time.
"I don't fault GE for this," Spitzer said. "They are doing precisely what
they want to be
doing, which is to drag this out. I have been a lawyer on behalf of companies
with administrative problems. You always try to delay it. Why? Maybe the
assistant who is handling the case will get married, will go off, will find
another job and the case will be handed to somebody else and
it will take another two years. The people I fault are the government lawyers
who haven't pursued the issue with sufficient assiduousness, with inadequate
aggressiveness in moving the ball forward."
Spitzer admits he does not know whether GE's methodology is scientifically
superior. He said that with a few good
lawyers and some expert witnesses, he could force GE to clean up the Hudson
River if litigation is necessary. The Democrat said Attorney General Dennis
Vacco had ousted, for political reasons, many of the state's top environmental
lawyers. Vacco's office did not return a call seeking comment.
Spitzer said he would give GE four months to do further tests to find out the
effects of concentrations of PCBs -- hot spots -- in the river. The EPA, which
announced findings that GE disputes, says the pollutants, which are suspected
to
cause cancer in humans, are leaching into the river.
"I am convinced there is liability
on GE's part," Spitzer said. "It is clear to me that GE has been winning the
delay game."
GE spokesman David Warshaw confirmed the meeting and said it was called by GE
because of Spitzer's ad campaign.
GE, he said, has spent $ 150 million to clean up PCBs in the region of its
Hudson Falls plant and the work has resulted in "significant improvements,
without dredging."
"Our focus on . . . controlling sources of PCBs, which allows significant
natural recovery to occur . . . is the best option, and one we will continue to
pursue," he said.
Vacco's staff has repeatedly said the attorney general has a strong
record on environmental issues.
"We haven't heard Mr. Vacco say anything about this issue in the last two
years," said Cara Lee, environmental director for Scenic Hudson, a coalition
working to improve the river's quality. "That's disappointing."
Comments on this posting?
Click here to post a public comment on the Trash Talk
Bulletin Board.
Click here to send a private comment to the Junkman.
Material presented on this home page constitutes opinion of Steven J. Milloy.
Copyright © 1998 Steven
J. Milloy. All rights reserved on original material. Material copyrighted by others is used either with permission or under a claim of "fair
use." Site developed and hosted by WestLake
Solutions, Inc.