Global warming lucency
By S. Fred Singer
Copyright 1998 Washington Times
October 15, 1998
Undiluted hype about
global warming and climate disasters is polluting the journals and airwaves;
multimillion-dollar propaganda campaigns are underway by environmental
activists, generously financed by compliant foundations and by government
grants. The White House is putting pressure on civic and religious groups, and
even
on corporations, to join the apocalyptic chorus. It's time to review some
facts that need to be more widely known:
(1) The climate is never just
"average." It changes all the time, from season to season, year to year, and over the
millennia. And that includes not only temperature, but rain,
snow, droughts, storms, and every conceivable feature of the weather. So watch
out when you read about the
"hottest year,"
"longest drought," or
"biggest hurricane." There is bound to be a weather record of some sort, set at some time,
somewhere in the world.
(2) But are there long-term
climate trends? Is it getting warmer or is it getting colder? The correct
answer is: Yes. It all depends on the time scale you choose. The global
climate has warmed over the last 100 years, but not appreciably over the last
50 years. It is colder now than
it was 1,000 years ago. And do you recall that the global climate cooled from
1940 until about 1975, raising fears of an impending ice age?
(3) Are human activities influencing climate? Yes, of course. The rise of
agriculture and the growth of cities have changed the local climate
significantly. With increasing populations and rising industrial activity
there have also been some worldwide changes: Temperature extremes have
softened, the stratosphere is cooling, the frequency of hurricanes has been
diminishing -all of these are thought to be human influences
on the atmosphere. But this does not mean there will be a catastrophic or even
a substantial warming of the climate in the next century.
(4) But isn't there substantial climate warming already because of the
increased burning of fossil fuels - oil, gas, and coal - that creates more
carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere? Well, carbon dioxide (CO2) levels are certainly rising, but the
climate seems not to be warming, as many would expect. It did warm greatly
between 1880 and 1940 long before CO2 increased significantly. But in the last
two decades, since 1979, weather satellites and
balloon-borne radio sondes agree that climate has not warmed - even though CO2
levels rose.
(5) And why hasn't climate warmed, when theory clearly expects this to happen?
The answer must be that even our best computer models of the atmosphere are
incomplete and leave out important features. Only in the
last few years have modelers started to include ocean currents, atmospheric
aerosol particles and dust into climate models. Most now suspect that clouds
are the main reason why models and observations do not agree.
(6) What about global calamities, like the spread of tropical diseases and
sea-level rise?
Well, since the climate is not warming, there is no real reason for concern.
Diseases are not just spread by mosquitoes, but nowadays mostly by human
contacts - which have been increasing markedly with the tremendous rise in
global transportation. Informed scientists predict that sea level will
drop - not rise - if oceans warm; the evaporated moisture may simply turn to
snow in the polar regions and increase the thickness of the Greenland and
Antarctic ice caps.
(7) So, would a
global warming be good or bad? Probably both; but overall, warming is definitely better than
cooling.
It is certainly better for agriculture and therefore for basic human existence.
All historical evidence shows that during the warm periods of the Middle Ages
(around 1100 AD) people were better off than during the hard times of the
"Little Ice Age" (1450-1850) when crops failed and people
starved.
(8) When it comes to it, what can we do about climate warming? We can do
little about the climate itself, but we could try to stop the increase of
atmospheric CO2. Even that task is daunting; it requires that we cut emissions
- worldwide - by between 60 percent and 80 percent. In
effect, this means cutting energy consumption by comparable amounts - including
all transportation, heating, air conditioning, and electricity use. It would
have an enormous negative impact on people's welfare - particularly for the
poor and those in developing countries.
(9) How would one reduce energy
consumption by between 60 percent and 80 percent? There are basically two
ways, short of drastically reducing population itself: energy rationing or
energy taxes. Rationing means a political allocation, with governments and
bureaucrats deciding who may use energy and who may not. Energy
taxes are almost as unpalatable; just try to picture $5-per-gallon gasoline.
Those who promote the Kyoto Protocol, signed in 1997, argue it can all be done
by conservation - at little or no cost; but that's just not credible.
(10) Should we ruin our economies and
cause tremendous hardship for people to counter a phantom threat? That's a
leading question; climate warming does indeed seem far away and a minor problem
at that. There is a sure threat to human existence, however, and that is the
near-certainty of a coming ice age. Geologists tell
us the present interglacial warm period will soon come to an end. Perhaps
greenhouse warming can save us from a frozen future.
Will scientific facts turn off the hype? Don't bet on it. Not until the
public becomes fully aware of the
tremendous costs imposed by the policies now being developed to meet a
non-existing problem.
S. Fred Singer is president of the Science
& Environmental Policy Project in Fairfax and professor emeritus of
environmental sciences at the University of Virginia. He was the first
director of the U.S. Weather Satellite
Service.
Comments on this posting?
Click here to post a public comment on the Trash Talk
Bulletin Board.
Click here to send a private comment to the Junkman.
Material presented on this home page constitutes opinion of Steven J. Milloy.
Copyright © 1998 Steven
J. Milloy. All rights reserved on original material. Material copyrighted by others is used either with permission or under a claim of "fair
use." Site developed and hosted by WestLake
Solutions, Inc.