Do something about the weather
Editorial
Copyright 1998 The Chattanooga Times
August 18, 1998
Members of Congress are home on recess and as people do, they've probably
passed some time with friends talking about the weather. What they ought to do
is take some tips from the weather and realize they need to do some serious
work when they get back to Washington.
The tips the weather offers come in the form of extreme
heat, which has killed more than 100 people this summer in Texas alone.
They come in the form of widespread droughts that have abetted incredible fires
in some areas and evoked comparisons to the Dust Bowl years in the nation's
breadbasket.
They come in the form of unusually heavy rainfall in other parts of the country
that scientists know raises the danger of waterborne diseases.
Those are the
immediate weather issues. Others are longer term.
July was the hottest month ever recorded -- by a full half-degree. That is huge
in scientific circles where notable change is generally measured in hundredths
of a degree.
And July was no aberration. Every month this year has been hotter than the same
month last year. And last year was the warmest since 1880, when records were
first kept.
Nine of the past 11 years have set such records. The 12 hottest years ever
recorded on Earth have all occurred since 1980.
Something is happening.
It clearly fits the scientific description of
global
warming -- with an extra kick this year from El Nino.
We all got well acquainted with that weather system. For a long while this
year, it got blamed for pretty much every awful bit of weather, but an equally
strong El Nino in the
early 1980s produced far less warming. That suggests 1998's edition can't carry
all the blame for record-setting heat.
But El Nino 1998 may, by magnifying the
global warming trend, have given us an early taste of what's to come -- if we do nothing to
curb the warming of the Earth. And it appears that doing nothing is precisely
the intention of Congress.
So far this year all Congress has done on this issue is resist Clinton
administration funding requests for research into and programs to promote
energy efficiency and clean-fuel technologies. Advocates of this retrograde
position
say they're keeping the administration from trying to comply with the Kyoto
Protocol on
global warming without Senate approval. That's hogwash.
The programs being slashed in Congress predated the Kyoto accords, and many
previously enjoyed bipartisan support. That's because they're good for America.
Whether or not the Kyoto treaty is ever
ratified, the United States has a direct self-interest in reducing the manmade
pollution that causes
global warming. The pollution comes primarily from burning fossil fuels. The self-interest
lies in the fact that addressing the problem of
global warming requires investments that will bring other important
social and economic benefits.
It requires investment in developing cleaner-fuel technologies and in using
less energy to accomplish the same things more efficiently. Advances in these
areas will make U.S. industries more globally competitive. They will lower
ground-level ozone,
tiny particulate and other forms of pollution that damage Americans' health and
degrade our quality of life. And they will stretch our supplies of fossil
fuels.
These are good things for our country. Congress should be promoting, not
impeding, them.
But the big industries that make money from maintaining the status quo are all
too pleased with the congressional
stonewall being erected. Once again, big-monied campaign contributors are being
served instead of the public interest.
Comments on this posting?
Click here to post a public comment on the Trash Talk
Bulletin Board.
Click here to send a private comment to the Junkman.
Material presented on this home page constitutes opinion of Steven J. Milloy.
Copyright © 1998 Steven
J. Milloy. All rights reserved on original material. Material copyrighted by others is used either with permission or under a claim of "fair
use." Site developed and hosted by WestLake
Solutions, Inc.